Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The social sciences have made few direct empirical contributions to the understanding of 'non-specific' benefits of treatment and generally the symbolic healing of indigenous non-Western medicine has received most attention in this field. This paper reports some results of a wider study of neurological clinics in England in which it is shown that a sample attending for headaches experienced considerable improvement in symptoms when followed up 1 year after attendance. Most of this improvement appeared not to be due to any intended treatments received at the clinics but could be attributed to the quality of patients' immediate responses to clinic attendance as assessed from research interviews conducted after their consultations. This relationship between immediate 'satisfied' response and subsequent symptomatic improvement is interpreted in terms of the general levels of expectancy and sense of potential control achieved by obtaining referral to a specialist which directly enhanced recovery in those patients who felt the doctor's actions to be directly relevant to their personal concerns. Disappointment with the doctor reduced the 'non-specific' therapeutic benefits of the hospital referral. The intimate connections of patient satisfaction, treatment received and subsequent outcomes need more careful consideration in social studies of Western medicine. © 1983.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/0277-9536(83)90057-6

Type

Journal article

Journal

Social Science and Medicine

Publication Date

01/01/1983

Volume

17

Pages

501 - 510