Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

A qualitative study of child clinicians in a non-profit HMO examined implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for anxiety and oppositional defiant disorders using interviews and focus groups with 33 clinicians (97% of participants), and ethnography of emails and meetings. Analysis showed statistical measures of access and service-key elements of rating organizations' "report cards"- were central in creating "pressure" making transition to EBPs difficult. EBPs were secondary to access and service targets. "Research" and "statistics" were perceived as unrealistic, "literature" as lacking authority. Rating organizations should include outcome and fidelity metrics to align market share pressures with children's health.

Type

Journal article

Journal

Administration and Policy in Mental Health

Publication Date

05/2011

Volume

38

Pages

203 - 210

Keywords

Anxiety; attention deficit disruptive behavior disorder; child health services; evidence based medicine; health maintenance organizations; health plan implementation; health plan implementation methods; health services accessibility; marketing health services; nonprofit; organizations; pilot projects; qualitative research